A California funeral home is facing a lawsuit over what the family’s attorney describes as a deeply disturbing and avoidable error: handing a grieving father a bag containing his son’s brain instead of the young man’s clothing.

The incident, reported by ABC7 News’ I-Team, has triggered allegations of mishandling human remains, lack of disclosure, and an attempted cover-up—raising serious questions about oversight and accountability in the funeral services industry.

What happened at the San Jose funeral home?

Alexander Pinon, 27, died on May 19. His family arranged funeral services at Lima Family Erickson Memorial Chapel on Willow Street in San Jose, opting for a $10,000 full-service memorial tribute package, according to the lawsuit.

A request for clothing—followed by a shocking discovery

The family planned to bury Pinon in formal attire and asked the funeral director to return his original clothes. Instead, the father was given a bag that allegedly contained his son’s brain.

According to the lawsuit:

• The father took the bag home, believing it contained clothing
• He placed the contents into the washing machine
• During the wash, material resembling a human brain fell out

At the time, he did not realize what it was.

“They wanted to have a dignified farewell for him,” said family attorney Samer Habbas, speaking to ABC7.

How the funeral home allegedly responded

No explanation, no apology

After discovering something was seriously wrong, Pinon’s father returned to the funeral home and handed the material to Anita Singh, identified in the lawsuit as the funeral director.

According to Habbas:

• Singh took the bag without explanation
• She did not disclose whose remains they were
• No apology or clarification was offered

“She said, ‘I’ll take that from here,’” Habbas told ABC7.

Alexander Pinon was buried at Oak Hill Memorial Cemetery the following day, without the brain.

The most troubling allegation: storage for months

A whistleblower comes forward

Several weeks after the burial, an employee at the funeral home allegedly contacted Pinon’s father to disclose the truth: the material in the bag was Alex’s brain.

The whistleblower further claimed that after it was returned:

• The brain was placed in a box
• It was left in the funeral home’s courtyard
• It remained there for more than two and a half months

According to the lawsuit, an employee only noticed the box after the smell of a “rotting human brain” became overwhelming.

If proven, the claim would represent a serious violation of health, safety, and professional standards.

Allegations of a cover-up

Habbas told ABC7 News that the funeral home attempted to conceal the mistake rather than notify the family or correct it promptly.

The lawsuit accuses the funeral home of:

• Mishandling human remains
• Failing to inform the family of the error
• Emotional distress caused by negligence
• Breach of trust and professional duty

The case centers not just on the mistake itself but on how it was handled afterward.

The role of Service Corporation International

The Lima Family Erickson Memorial Chapel reportedly referred the family to its parent company, Service Corporation International (SCI)—the largest funeral services provider in North America, operating under the Dignity Memorial brand.

SCI declined to comment on the allegations.

In a statement to ABC7, the company said it would not comment because the matter is “active litigation.”

The family remains silent as legal process unfolds

Pinon’s parents have chosen not to speak publicly about the incident. According to their attorney, they are working with legal counsel on a plan to properly bury the brain.

For now, the lawsuit is their primary means of seeking accountability.

Why this case matters

Trust at the most vulnerable moment

Funeral homes operate at a uniquely sensitive intersection of grief, trust, and professionalism. Families rely on them during some of the most painful moments of their lives.

This case raises broader concerns about:

• Oversight of funeral service providers
• Training and internal protocols
• Transparency when serious errors occur

Even a single failure can have lifelong emotional consequences for families.

Regulatory scrutiny likely to follow

If the allegations are substantiated, the case could prompt scrutiny from:

• State licensing boards
• Health departments
• Consumer protection agencies

It may also renew calls for stricter standards and inspections in the funeral services industry.

What happens next?

Key developments to watch include:

• Court filings detailing the funeral home’s internal procedures
• Possible regulatory investigations
• Whether additional employees come forward
• Any policy changes announced by SCI

The outcome could shape how funeral homes across California—and beyond—handle remains, disclosures, and accountability.

TL;DR

• A San Jose funeral home allegedly gave a father his son’s brain instead of clothing.
• The family says the funeral director offered no explanation or apology.
• A whistleblower claims the brain was stored improperly for over two months.
• The family has filed a lawsuit alleging mishandling of human remains and emotional distress.
• The parent company, Service Corporation International, has declined to comment due to ongoing litigation.