In the early 2010s, Nicole Daedone was widely seen as a provocative voice in the wellness world, promoting a practice she said centered female pleasure and emotional connection. By 2026, that narrative has shifted dramatically. A federal court in Brooklyn sentenced Daedone to nine years in prison on forced labor charges, concluding that her company’s inner workings were far from the empowerment it advertised.

This article explains who Nicole Daedone is, what “orgasmic meditation” involves, and why prosecutors say the model crossed into exploitation.

Who is Nicole Daedone?

Nicole Daedone is the co-founder of OneTaste Inc, a California-based organization launched in 2004. The company positioned itself as a sexual wellness and self-help platform focused on women’s pleasure, relationships, and personal growth.

From niche idea to mainstream attention

By the 2010s, OneTaste had become a cultural talking point. It expanded to cities including Los Angeles and London and drew media attention for its unconventional approach.

• Workshops and retreats promised emotional breakthroughs
• The company marketed itself as a blend of therapy, mindfulness, and sexuality
• It attracted professionals, entrepreneurs, and wellness seekers

At its peak, OneTaste was seen by supporters as part of a broader movement challenging taboos around female sexuality.

The $12 million exit

Daedone sold her stake in the company in 2017 for approximately $12 million. The organization has since been rebranded as the Institute of OM Foundation.

What is “orgasmic meditation”?

“Orgasmic meditation,” often abbreviated as OM, was the centerpiece of OneTaste’s offerings.

How the practice works

The technique involves:

• A structured session lasting about 15 minutes
• A clothed male partner manually stimulating a female participant
• A group or guided setting
• A stated goal of mindfulness rather than sexual gratification

Daedone described OM as a way to:

• Reduce stress
• Improve emotional awareness
• Build interpersonal connection

Why it gained traction

The concept stood out in a crowded wellness market. It blended elements of:

• Mindfulness practices
• Sexual therapy
• Group dynamics

For some participants, it offered a sense of community and exploration. For critics, it blurred boundaries in ways that raised ethical concerns.

What were the allegations against Nicole Daedone?

Prosecutors argued that behind the branding of empowerment was a system of control and coercion.

Forced labor and manipulation claims

According to the case presented in federal court:

• Members were pressured into performing sexual acts with clients and investors
• These acts were framed as necessary for “growth,” “freedom,” or “enlightenment”
• Participants were not paid as promised
• Some were encouraged to take on debt, including new credit cards, to pay for courses

The government alleged that these tactics created a cycle of dependency, both financial and psychological.

The role of company leadership

Rachel Cherwitz, the company’s former sales director, was also convicted following a five-week trial.

Prosecutors described a coordinated effort to recruit, train, and pressure members into compliance.

What did prosecutors say in court?

Federal officials framed the case as a clear example of exploitation disguised as wellness.

Key statements from the prosecution

Assistant U.S. Attorney Nina Gupta said victims gave up:

• Their money
• Their time
• Their bodies
• Their dignity

She argued that many were left emotionally and psychologically damaged.

Joseph Nocella, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, described Daedone and her co-defendant as individuals who “preyed on vulnerable victims” through promises of empowerment.

What was the defense’s argument?

Daedone’s legal team pushed back on the severity of the charges and sentencing.

Key points from the defense

• She had no prior criminal record
• Supporters submitted over 200 letters attesting to her character
• They argued her work had helped many people

Notably, public divs including Van Jones and Richard Schiff voiced support, describing her as influential and compassionate.

Her lawyers have indicated plans to appeal the verdict.

Why does this case matter?

The Nicole Daedone case sits at the intersection of wellness culture, power dynamics, and regulation.

The blurred line between empowerment and exploitation

The wellness industry often operates in gray areas:

• Practices are loosely regulated
• Emotional vulnerability is part of the model
• Charismatic leadership can shape group behavior

This case raises questions about when self-help crosses into coercion.

The broader conversation around wellness accountability

The rise of alternative wellness practices has outpaced oversight. While many programs operate ethically, others exploit gaps in regulation.

What experts suggest

• Stronger consumer protection laws
• Clearer definitions of consent in group settings
• Greater scrutiny of organizations blending therapy and commerce

TL;DR

• Nicole Daedone founded OneTaste, a company built around “orgasmic meditation”
• The practice was marketed as a form of mindfulness and empowerment
• Prosecutors said the company coerced members into sexual acts and unpaid labor
• She was sentenced to nine years in prison and ordered to forfeit $12 million
• The case raises broader concerns about accountability in the wellness industry