Quick Summary

• Valentina Gomez, a Republican candidate in Texas, burned the Quran in a video, sparking global condemnation.
• Born in Colombia in 1999, she moved to the U.S. in 2009 and later worked in real estate and finance.
• Her political profile is built on extremist stunts targeting Muslims, Black Americans, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ communities.
• Previously ran unsuccessfully for Missouri Secretary of State in 2024.
• Despite little electoral success, she leverages controversy to remain a visible far-right div.
  
  Valentina Gomez, a Republican candidate for Texas’ 31st Congressional District, has ignited a firestorm of criticism after posting a video in which she used a flamethrower to burn a copy of the Quran. The act, widely condemned as Islamophobic, was shared across social media platforms earlier this week, resulting in bans on most platforms except X, where the clip continues to circulate.

Gomez, 26, is no stranger to controversy. Her political identity has been built on inflammatory stunts, extremist rhetoric, and appeals to far-right culture wars.

What did Valentina Gomez do?

In the Quran-burning video, Gomez declared she aimed to “end Islam in Texas.” She urged Muslims to leave the state, stating, “Muslims can f** off to any of the 57 Muslim nations.” *

She later defended the stunt, claiming she felt no regret and accusing Islam itself of being responsible for global terrorism, including the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks in Israel.

The episode adds to a pattern of provocative performances designed to amplify her visibility, even at the cost of widespread outrage.

Who is Valentina Gomez?

• Birthplace and background: Born May 8, 1999, in Medellín, Colombia. Her family immigrated to the United States in 2009.
• Professional life: Before politics, she worked as a real estate investor and held positions in the financial sector, including a role at Nestlé focused on financial and strategic optimization.
• Political career: Entered politics in 2024 with a failed campaign for Missouri Secretary of State, finishing sixth with 7.4% of the vote. Now campaigning in Texas.

A history of extremist stunts

According to The Independent and other outlets, Gomez’s political strategy has consistently leaned on shock value:

• Anti-immigrant actions: In December 2024, she filmed a mock execution of an immigrant by shooting a dummy tied to a chair, saying: “Public executions for any illegal that rapes or kills an American. They don’t deserve deportation; they deserve to be ended.”
• Anti-Black rhetoric: She dismissed Juneteenth as “the most ratchet of holidays” and suggested Black Americans who “don’t like” the U.S. should “kindly leave.”
• Anti-LGBTQ+ attacks: In February 2024, she used a flamethrower to torch a pile of LGBTQ+ books.
• Consistent MAGA alignment: She identifies as a staunch supporter of Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again movement.

These actions have led to repeated bans from social media platforms, though she maintains a following on X, where right-wing extremist content is less restricted.

Why does she matter politically?

Though her electoral performance has been weak so far, Gomez has gained notoriety as part of a wave of far-right Republican candidates who thrive on media attention, regardless of political success.

Her campaigns raise larger questions about:

• Extremism in US politics: Gomez’s rhetoric echoes broader debates about how much space far-right divs are being given in mainstream political discourse.
• Digital radicalization: Her reliance on shock videos demonstrates how social platforms can amplify fringe voices.
• Threats to minority communities: Her stunts have drawn concern from civil rights groups, who warn of rising hostility toward Muslims, Black Americans, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ communities.

Whether Gomez ultimately wins office or not, her presence underscores how provocation itself has become a political strategy.

What happens next?

Gomez remains an active candidate in Texas’ 31st Congressional District. Legal experts note that while burning religious texts is generally protected under U.S. free speech laws, her call for Muslims to leave the state could invite scrutiny under hate speech and incitement statutes.

The fallout from her latest stunt is likely to keep her in the headlines, even as mainstream Republicans distance themselves from her tactics.